Ravenfire
15-01-2005, 10:27 AM
Parents who give their children anything other than the mildest of smacks face up to five years in jail after the introduction of new laws. The legislation bans any smacking that leaves a mark on the child but does allow mild taps. If the smack causes bruises, grazes, scratches, minor swelling or cuts the perpetrator could be charged with common assault. But it has been criticised by child protection groups for not being a total ban and others for interfering in parents' rights to bring up their children.
NSPCC boss Mary Marsh said: "Hitting a child remains legal, as long as parents do not cause children injury amounting to anything more transient than a reddening of the skin. "The new law is flawed - there is a risk that parents may choose to hit children on parts of their body where injury is less visible."
Some 47 Labour MPs voted for a total ban on smacking when the law was introduced in the Children Act last November. But a spokesman for the Department for Education and Skills insisted the Government would not tolerate violence against children. She said: "This common-sense decision balances the essential need for children to be protected with the right of parents not to have government interfering in family life."
NSPCC boss Mary Marsh said: "Hitting a child remains legal, as long as parents do not cause children injury amounting to anything more transient than a reddening of the skin. "The new law is flawed - there is a risk that parents may choose to hit children on parts of their body where injury is less visible."
Some 47 Labour MPs voted for a total ban on smacking when the law was introduced in the Children Act last November. But a spokesman for the Department for Education and Skills insisted the Government would not tolerate violence against children. She said: "This common-sense decision balances the essential need for children to be protected with the right of parents not to have government interfering in family life."